Cyclospora
angimurinensis
was found in 1 of 20 mice collected for the original study you found (Ford, Duszynski & McAllister, 1990). At the time of the study, there were six
other described species of cyclospora in mammals, all from moles. The new cyclosporan is different in that it
has an oocyst residuum, that is, a mass of cytoplasmic material outside of the
sporocyst and inside of the oocyst. A
sporocyst is the initial lifecycle stage of the parasite. Sporocysts, when inside of oocysts, are the infective stage to mammals and birds. An oocyst is essentially comparable to an egg
of a female. The new cyclosporan
described also has different-shaped sporocysts with different length by width
ratios.
Eimeria
chaetodipi
was found in 3 of 20 mice collected. This
specimen has sporulated oocysts that are shaped like those of Eimeria liomysis, another coccidian
parasite that infects heteromyid rodents, but is smaller. Eimeria
hispidensis was found in 4 of 20 mice.
This species has sporulated oocysts that are also similar to E. liomysis, but has an oocyst residuum
that is not found in E. liomysis.
Heteromyid rodents nest in underground
burrows in which no more than one individual typically resides. Its fecal matter is deposited in side tunnels
away from the burrow. This separation of
territory could limit heteromyids from coccidian exposure, and infection
prevalence is consequently moderate.
Heteromyids inhabiting the plains and prairie regions of the midwestern
United States seem to have a high prevalence of infection due to greater
amounts of humidity and precipitation unlike those inhabitants of desert areas (Ford, Duszynski & McAllister, 1990).
Some of the reported coccidians of
heteromyid rodents are host-specific while others are not, which could be due
to unique morphological and biochemical properties of the rodents or the
diverse host range of coccidian parasites.
It appears that the three described species of coccidians are not much
to worry about as they like warmer, humid climates and are partial to small
mammals (Ford, Duszynski &
McAllister, 1990). On another note, the “diverse host
range” sparks your interest, especially when you stumble upon a massive listing
of hosts, unfortunately including humans and domestic animals under the mammals
section (Duszynski, Upton & Couch, 1998).
Looks like you’re going to have to hit the books again and find out
about the pathology and lifecycles associated with the human and pet species of
coccidia.
References
Ford, P. L., Duszynski, D. W., &
McAllister, C. T. (1990). Coccidia (apicomplexa) from heteromyid rodents in the
Southwestern United States, Baja California, and Northern Mexico with three new
species from Chaetodipus hispidus. Journal
of parasitology, 76(3), 325-331.
Duszynski, D.
W., Upton, S. J., & Couch, L. (1998). The coccidia of the world.
Retrieved from http://biology.unm.edu/biology/coccidia/table.html
I really like how this is very scientific, yet has a casual tone at the same time. It maked for a great read.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading this, I really hope these parasites don't make their way to New England! If that happens, we'll really have to be more careful about outside pets (and it looks like my cats won't be coming in the house anymore). If the winters here continue to be on the warmer side, I wonder if it'll effect these parasites' distribution? Let's hope we don't have to find out!