Tkach et al. (2012) add Opisthioglyphe sharmai to the growing
list of parasitic species that have turtles as their hosts with their species
description. The turtles were bought from professional trappers in Malaysia and
were killed about a week later in order to necropsy them and search for
internal parasites. A new species of trematode was identified in the gall
bladder, which is a highly unusual location in the definitive host (Tkach et
al., 2012). The specimens were then collected for close observation and
identification.
Many characteristics were noted such
as the body length, width, various ratios of body parts, the
size/shape/location of male and female reproductive organs and the differences
between juvenile and adult specimens (Tkach et al., 2012). There were many
features that indicated that O. sharmai
was indeed a new species of trematode. Their cirrus sac extends farther
posterior to the ventral sucker, when all other species of Opisthioglyphe have a cirrus sac that is anterior to the ventral sucker
or partially overlaps it. Tkach et al. (2012) proceeded to mention specific
details that differentiate O. sharmai
from other species in the same genus. The definitive hosts of O. sharmai are Malayan box turtles, Cuora amboinensis, and black marsh
turtles, Siebenrockiella crassicollis.
Tkach et al. (2012) conclude their
species identification by mentioning the differentiation that they believe
exists between the new species (O.
sharmai) and another species (Opisthioglyphe
koisarensis) that supposedly also has a posteriorly extending cirrus sac.
Tkach et al. (2012) consider the drawings and article that introduce O. koisarensis to be brief and
incomplete, which questions the validity of truth of the article. The authors
actually consider O. koisarensis to belong
in Dolichosalcus because of the shown
distribution of vitelline follicles are characteristic of Dolichosalcus and not of Opisthioglyphe
(Tkach et al., 2012). Future studies
should be done to try to find O.
koisarensis and compare it directly to O.
sharmai in order to know for certain that they are separate species.
The information that is introduced
by Tkach et al. (2012) continues to expand on the already known parasites of
turtles introduced by previous articles. Ogawa et al. (1997) introduced Balaenophilus as an ectoparasite of sea
turtles, and Rigby et al. (2008) introduced two species of nematodes from Camallanus. All of these articles
emphasize the importance of details and an analytical mind when comparing
species to discover if there really is a new species discovered. In this case,
Tkach et al. (2012) introduce the importance of continuously critiquing
scientific knowledge. There was already a species with a posteriorly extending
cirrus sac (O. koisarensis), but the
authors looked at it and came to the conclusion that what was written wasn’t
accurate.
Works Cited:
Ogawa, K., Matsuzaki K., Misaki H.
1997. A New Species of Balaenophilus
(Copepoda: Harpacticoida), an Ectoparasite of a Sea Turtle in Japan. Zoological Science 14: 691-700.
Rigby, M. C., R. S. K. Sharma, R.
F. Hechinger, T. R. Platt and J. C. Weaver. 2008. Two New Species of Camallanus (Nematoda: Camallanidae) from
Freshwater Turtles in Queensland, Australia. The Journal of Parasitology 96 (4): 752-757.
Tkach, V.V., T.R., Platt and S.E.
Greiman. 2012. A New Species of Opisthioglyphe
(Trematoda: Telorchiidae) from Gall Bladder of Turtles in Malaysia. The Journal of Parasitology 98 (4): 863
– 868.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.